Headline grabbers

How much has this 'favourable announcemnt cost'

Monday, 16 November 2009 08:58

Regular readers will no doubt say 'is there no end to this cynicism'.

Today the government announced that the first of a batch of new helicopters had arrived in Afghanistan and would soon be followed by others etc etc.

Listening carefully to the limited announcement here is a distillation of pertinent facts:

  1. The first helicopter has arrived and it is part of just six.
  2. It has cost £45 million to equip these 6 helicopters to fly in the hot/dry conditions of Afghanistan.
  3. This first helicopter, and the others will arrive in pieces and it takes several WEEKS to re-assemble each one and make it ready for use.
  4. It will take until the end of the year for all to reach Afghanistan.

Here we have a perfect example of 'favourable announcement syndrome' whereby something that has already been announced is re-announced with lots of publicity to try to get extra benefit for the government. £45 million seems an awful lot of money just to change these aircraft, so how much is the total bill?

A cynical attempt to shaw up support for a failed government policy and make the public think things will get better.

 

Record EU fine for Intel

Wednesday, 13 May 2009 20:10

EU fines Intel €1.06

This follows on from the massive fines imposed on Microsoft.

What does this tell us about anti-competitive behaviour and the country where both of these companies are based?

Some may suggest that the US follows some dubious business practices in making money and squeezing out the competition. Microsoft has done some questionable things in the past, starting with the error message that appeared when you tried to load the Windows operating system but were not using Microsoft's DOS operating system on your computer. Read more about this. (new window)

It looks like Intel have been squeezing the competition too.

It comes as a big surprise to me that companies are willing to commit the future of their business to Microsoft's software when it is so prone to viruses and other malware. Similarly we now need to question the decision by Apple to move over to the Intel range of processors.

Companies should look to their own future and enure that they have more than one source of supply for essential components. It is in everyone's interest that there is more than one supplier.

If you want a prime example of this look at the sale of internet domain names, when these started out the cost was US $80 per year, and there was just one place you could buy them. That was more than 10 years ago and it was a vast sum of money.

Now there are many people selling and acting as name registrars you can buy names for around US $10.50 a year.

Competition works and we need more of it, not just in the commercial field but also in areas that are traditionally seen as the province of government.

 

Crisis budget is about saving Brown not the economy

Monday, 24 November 2008 08:01

Make no mistake, this crisis budget is about Gordon Brown's re-election and nothing to do with the economy. This is nothing more than a blatant attempt to bribe the electors. But at the back of it is the promise that taxes will rise. Those with any nouse don't need to be told that.

With government borrowing at around 100 billion pounds taxes have got to rise. The government does not have any money, all it has is the ability to tax us. That ability will be used brutally and relentlessly. Those who are old enough to remember previous Labour governments know it, and are shouting it from the rooftops, but a younger generation of politicians on the Conservative side does not seem to be shouting.

Those with the memories recall Dennis Healey and his oft quoted phrase about taxing "until the pips squeak" and those pips really did squeak. The income tax rate was 35%, that's not a misprint, it was 35%. It took a long time for later Conservative governments to reduce it and get the country back on track. While this was happening most of the current generation of politicians were in short trousers and shielded from it all. They need to read some recent history.

A VAT cut would be nice, but are we really going to pour into the shops and burden ourselves with debt or spend what we have to save a small amount when we can already get deals like Tesco's half price wine PLUS 25% off the discounted price in Tesco points? or M & S's 20% off everything?

Reductions like these are huge, and they are not causing queues at the doors before opening, so Brown's vote buying is hardly likely to succeed.

   

Page 1 of 5